Deal MappingMap a deal
Teardown 07

The framework a software tool would rent

The framework already has a name people repeat. A software tool serving the very same people is quietly desperate for exactly that, and does not know you exist yet.

The short answer

A named framework or method is digital IP: write it once and it guides an unlimited number of people. A software tool that sells to your exact audience survives on those users getting a result and staying, so it has a naturally existing economic reason to license your framework and build it into how they onboard and keep customers. The missed deal is renting your method to the tool, so it earns while you keep owning it.

What you can see from the outside

A creator works out a framework, gives it a name, and shares it freely with their audience. People repeat the name, they get results, they say thank you. It is generous, and it is also an asset that only ever earns goodwill.

Somewhere close by is a software tool built for the exact same people. That tool has a problem the creator has already solved: its users sign up, get lost, and drift away before they see a result. The framework is the missing on-ramp that would keep those users around. The tool needs it to survive, and it does not know the creator exists.

Who holds what

SideWhat they hold
The creatorA named, proven framework their audience already trusts and repeats
The software toolA base of users, a budget, and a survival-level need for those users to get a result and stay
What each is missingThe creator lacks reach into the tool user base; the tool lacks a trusted method to turn sign-ups into results

The deal hiding in plain sight

The deal is to license the framework to the tool, so it becomes the way the tool onboards and guides its users. The creator earns a share and reaches an audience the size of the tool user base. The tool keeps more customers because more of them finally get a result. That is a naturally existing economic relationship: the tool already lives or dies on the thing the framework fixes.

The value runs well past the cheque. The creator method gets stamped on the experience of thousands of users, which builds a reputation no amount of posting would buy. The tool looks like it finally understands its customers. Because a framework does not run out, the creator can license a version of it to a second, non-competing tool later.

How to map it yourself

  1. 1

    Turn the framework into a licensable asset

    Name it, write it down, and make it something a company could build into a product: the steps, the order, the checklists. A loose idea cannot be rented. A defined method can.

  2. 2

    Find who is on the accounts payable side of your audience

    List the tools, suppliers and platforms that already pay to reach your people and need them to succeed. Those are your warmest renters, because your framework protects their revenue.

  3. 3

    Open with the symptom they already track

    Software companies watch users sign up and vanish. Name that situation, then show that your framework is the on-ramp that keeps them, and the conversation rolls downhill.

  4. 4

    Structure it as a rental, priced to the value

    Rent the framework for a share or a fee per user, set what they can and cannot change, and keep owning it. Price it against what losing those users costs them, not what an ebook sells for.

The first move

The first move is often a warm introduction, not a cold pitch. Ask your own audience which tools they use, then reach out to one whose users would benefit, opening with the situation they already feel rather than a description of your framework.

Watch whether the tool sees the survival link. If they recognise that your method keeps their users around, the price stops being the argument, and you are building a deal together instead of haggling over a licence.

When this deal is the wrong move

When this is the wrong tool

  • The framework is not really distinct or proven. If it is a loose collection of tips anyone could assemble, there is little to license, so sharpen and prove it first.
  • The tool has no real economic stake in user results. If they are paid whether or not users succeed, the naturally existing pull is missing and the pitch turns cold.
  • You are unwilling to let anyone adapt the method. Building a framework into software usually means some adaptation, so if that is a hard no, this deal will chafe.

Questions people ask

What is a naturally existing economic relationship, in plain terms?

It is someone who already makes or loses money based on how your audience does. A tool your people pay for, a supplier that sells into your market, an association they belong to. Because their livelihood is tied to your audience succeeding, handing them a way to help is welcome, and a warm introduction from inside that relationship beats any cold pitch.

How do I price licensing a framework to a company?

Price it against what the problem costs them, not what a course sells for. If your framework keeps users from leaving, it is worth a slice of the revenue those users represent. A share per user, a flat fee per period, or a minimum with an upside all work. Let them name a number first, then build the deal from there.

Could I license the same framework to more than one company?

Yes, as long as they are not direct competitors and your terms allow it. A framework does not run out, so the same method can guide several tools in different niches. Just be careful not to hand exclusivity away by accident, and keep each deal from undercutting the others.

Keep going

Written by Greg Courtepatte

Deal Mapper in Alberta. I find the missing side of a deal and help get it moving. LinkedIn

What deal is hiding in your situation?

Tell me what you already have and what you would like more of. The free Deal Map reads your side the way this teardown does, and names the first move.